چیه باورت نمی شه که ...

عرض ادب دارم دارم خدمت بچه های آهنگ ساز و کسانی که در این راه قدم برداشتن .

آرزوی موفقیت دارم برای همه .

این وبلاگ برای دوستان عزیز آهنگ ساز شکل گرفته شده است ...

امیدوارم که از مطالب در این راستا استفاده ی مفید و کافی را ببرید.

خوب . . .

هدف : تبادل (VST(i و اطلاعات موجود در ذهن شما ( و البته من ) وانتقال آن به هم برای پیشرفت بهتر و بیشتر .

3 years & 5 months

107,827,200 seconds

1,797,120 minutes

29,952 hours

178 weeks

one day in  - one day out

this is me - this is me on time

tell me what you think is happening.

-Peace

The facts of the case, in brief, are that Dr. Smith, a family practitioner who also delivers babies, had his privileges revoked at Selma Community Hospital based exclusively on credentialing decisions taken at two other area hospitals.  All three hospitals were operated by the same system [Adventist Health System], and Dr. Smith and his brother, also a physician, operate a number of clinics which compete with Adventist Health in the communities where they are located. There was no indication that Dr. Smith had any quality of care or other issues at Selma.  He appealed the revocation of his privileges and at a full judicial review committee hearing, persuaded a panel of peers that the recommendation to revoke his privileges was not reasonable and warranted.  It appears evidence of political issues at the other two hospitals [business disputes, litigation, etc.] raised questions about the fairness of the actions taken against Dr. Smith at those hospitals, and the JRC committee did not want to revoke privileges at Selma based exclusively on questionable peer review at other institutions.

For a variety of reasons, the governing board at Selma reversed the decision of the JRC and reinstated the revocation of Dr. Smith’s privileges. Smith appealed by writ proceeding to Superior Court, where he prevailed, obtaining an order setting aside the decision of the governing board and reinstating the decision of the JRC hearing [where he won reinstatement of his privileges].  The hospital appealed to the Court of Appeal, leading to the published decision fully agreeing with the Superior Court that the decision of the governing board was fatally flawed, reinstating the decision of the JRC.

The most important aspect of the decision of the Court of Appeal is probably its refusal to let a governing board reverse a JRC decision without a clear factual and legal basis.  It concluded that a JRC was entitled to find peer review results from other hospitals an inadequate basis to discipline a physician, although it did not announce a rule that peer review from another institution can never, on its own, be enough to warrant discipline.  It simply held that under the facts of this case, it was entirely reasonable for the JRC to conclude the sister institutions’ peer review was not an adequate reason to take action against Dr. Smith’s privileges at Selma.

Also of interest is the fact that during the JRC hearing, Dr. Smith successfully introduced evidence of settlement negotiations Selma had conducted with him before revoking his privileges.  According to the Court of Appeal, that evidence was that the hospital offered to drop all peer review issues with Smith if he would dismiss a lawsuit he had pending against Selma.  The inference was that the peer review was being undertaking to obtain leverage against Dr. Smith regarding his law suit, and failing that, to punish him.  Selma apparently objected to Smith offering evidence of these discussions on the grounds of a long standing rule of evidence that holds that settlement discussions are inadmissible in civil proceedings.  The Court of Appeal quickly brushed aside Selma’s objection to the admission of this evidence, noting that formal rules of evidence do not apply in JRC hearings, and that the committee is entitled to hear any relevant evidence, “if it is the sort of evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs” [quoting the Selma professional staff bylaws].  As this is the common standard for JRC evidence [at least in California], this decision underscores that formal rules of evidence, including rules of privilege and evidence limitation do not apply in JRC hearings.

meanwhile

the dusk mulls.

it was an accident you
think, never asked
only pined
for a molting bed and fur
clung to white cotton.

the proof of it

the reassurance required when
playing house with a stray dog.

and in this time become cavernous
wait and tally
having learned to keep quiet and
let him roam if he's so called.

most times
you do the calling

he comes.

over and again,
over. same still breath
hitting the chest

same still breath later
evading it.

with fingers outstretched
before you, grasping to remember each
old friend and old
love that voyaged and then
expired

to bring you here-
another tack on the map

promising the same fate
the same creasing of perennial
skin.

your dream skulks

around his charmed
impermanence, or fully and other
wise in the fastidious and vincible
need for belonging, and
does it matter?,

other wise,
and for worse.

perhaps sourcing the root
of your
delirious wanting

it’s a moonthing

or rather
water drowning itself
under a breaking rock.

Fonte: Informativo STF nº 353
Jurisprudência em Revista Ano I - n° 25

Writeboard make it easy to: 

1. Write without fear of losing or overwriting a good idea
2. Compare different versions of a document
3. Collaborate with colleagues on copy, proposals, memos, etc.
4. Subscribe to documents via RSS and be notified of changes
5. Keep your writings organized with Backpack integration

Imagine how feeble our secularism is. So this guy liked TZP, he obviously would, it's a classic, what's the big deal? The deal is, that because Aamir has a certain political stand (and is also a Muslim?) it is automatically assumed that everything about him would be hated by this whole bunch of politicians. So it came as a total surprise when one of their leaders applauded Aamir’s work.

Goes to show how art and everything else take a back seat when there is a political difference, particularly if the difference is with a party which takes to violence at the drop of a hat. Everything is political here. Even the way you have sex, the way you display affection. They don't like it if you buy a greeting card for the person you love, so they barge into your house and beat the shit out of you. They barge into educational institutions and beat up the teachers, they once fondly called Guru and chanted "Guru Bramha Guru Vishnu". Public display of love is not acceptable but a display of hate and violence is honourable. (Ok that is a topic for a seperate post) 

As if increasing political interference in matters like art, culture, lifestyle, fashion wasn't enough now they have started fucking the law and order of the country, that too the criminal procedure. It was atrocious to hear Shiv Sena guy say, "Our belief is that no one would dare to commit such a misdeed infront of their near and dear one and hence we feel the arrested boys might be innocent." WTF.

Not only do they question the criminal procedure that is being implemented in the Mumbai molestation case by State police, thereby further raping the image of Indian Police, they go one step further and make an unconstitutional comment like, "It must be an outsider, a non maratha" Outsider? How did we become an outsider in our own country? Adolf Hitler is resurrected is it?

Not stopping at the public comment, Raj Thakrey takes a delegation of youth to Deputy Chief Minister RR Patils door trying to achieve...I don't know what... May be to request Mr. Patil (a legislator) to use his position to influence the investigations procedure adapted by the State police (an executive)? Everything about this incident is wrong. They are messing up with one of the fundamental features of our Constitution, the independence of 3 branches of Governance, namely, Legislator, Executive and Judiciary.

Look at the audacity here, Shiv Sena is suggesting the police is supposed to consider the region and culture meter (if any such thing exist) of the accused and relationships amongst the co-accused before making an arrest. Of course before sucking up to such an idea they should shove the Criminal Procedure Code up Shiv Sena's ass. I don't understand why the hell, the police chief of Mumbai not reacting to such propositions which are not just stupid but also criminal in nature.

Section 153A of Indian Penal Code says,

Whoever,

(a) By words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place or birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, or

(b) Commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities...

Shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Read the full section and you'll see this party might be booked under every clause of this section given their past records of constantly creating Maratha - Non Maratha divide, their violence against Bangladeshis, Biharis etc.

In fact this is the time when one would expect the Honorable High Court to take suo moto cognizance of the situation and issue a writ of mandamus to the concerned Mumbai police personnel directing him/her to make arrest of the Shiv Sena speaker for violating Section 153A. And may be another Writ directed to the Election Commission of India to cancel the political status of Shiv Sena for being a racist party. Talks of Maratha - Non Maratha, outsider - insider, our sons are so pure, they can never commit a crime, it’s the outsiders who are the cause of all trouble, what else are these but Racism?

[No more suggestions for HC otherwise they’d send one my door too, booked for Contempt of court]

Dad called to say, “I can’t write as good as you do, otherwise would have done it myself, please write to the prime minister to give a Bharat Ratna to our milk man, real nice guy he is, it seems they have them in plenty and its going out on first cum first serve.”