Irritation of the Day:   Barbie goes S & M!

One of the latest Barbies dolls is sporting leather, fish net hose---all to achieve that great S&M look.  Aside from the irritation I feel for a company (and consumers) who think this is OK, Barbie seems to be a reflection of our deteriorating culture.

What's next?  The she-man Barbie who gives birth?  Seems we've gone from "Suntan Barbie" of the 1970's to what will likely be the next new Barbie --  "California Same-Sex Marriage Barbie" complete with an intolerant attitude!

As a mother of two young girls, this push for Barbie-as-warped-role-model makes me angry and sad.

Whatever happened to innocence?

You probably relate to what I am saying, but probably have always equated such changes just to the new relationship itself and not the reality of STDs: Sexually Transmitted Demons. Every demon has a nature and specific corresponding characteristics. That is why groups of people that have no connection to each other but that are infested with the same type of demonic spirit, behave in very similar ways. We call them "stereotypes" but they are nothing less than "familiar spirits" that shape the character and personality of those that they influence. Hmmm... that's something to think about, isn't it?

When two people have sex, those two people become one. The same way that the physical bodies of the man and woman lock together and become one interlocked unit, so do their soul and spirit bodies. Every human being consists of three distinct bodies -- spirit, soul and flesh -- that function in unity with one another, as one unit. Each of those bodies operate in a different realm and each impacts the interactions of your entire human experience. Sexual activity causes two people to connect and become one in all three realms, thus allowing for the transmission of demonic spirits from one person to the other - the same way that sexual activity allows for the transmission of venereal diseases, such as clamyhdia, herpes and HIV, from one person to another.

What I am trying to get you to understand is that those changes that take place in your life after you get into a sexual relationship with someone are not a coincidence! They are a direct result of sexually transmitted demons. Have you ever done or said something that you found very uncharacteristic for yourself and thought, "Where in the world did that come from?"This happens as a result of different demonic spirits that we pick up, usually through sex. The unfortunate thing about it is that most people are completely oblivious to the reality of spiritual STDs, and even once they do become aware of them; it is often too little too late.

You may think that you can pick up a sexually transmitted demon and just go to the spiritual free clinic (church), and get a dose spiritual antibiotics (prayer) and go on about your business, unaffected by what you've done. But this is not so. Just as there are some sexually transmitted diseases that there are no cure for, there are some sexually transmitted demons that will stay with you indefinitely. Some venereal diseases cause permanent damage to the body such as impotence, erectile dysfunction, uterine pain, cervical and prostate cancer and worst of all - sterility (not being able to produce offspring)! Sexually transmitted demons can have the same impact on your destiny and purpose in the spirit realm!!!

I really want you to think about this carefully. we often take sex so frivolously, regarding it as just a physical act. But I assure you that sex is much more spiritual than it is physical and even if you can use a condom to prevent the transmission of natural STDs, there is no condom to protect yourself from the transmission of spiritual STDs. Abstinence is the only way - preserving sex for the confines of Holy Matrimony.

If you want to know more about sexually transmitted demons, you need to pick up my new book. It is entitled, "STDs: Sexually Transmitted Demons". You can find it on my website. It will be on amazon in a couple of weeks, but for now you can only get it from my website at www.laneenhaniah.com This book is totally off the chain. I wrote it for the younger generation but have found that the young people love the book, but the older people are loving it just as much - who knew! I have a special offer on my website for people that want to purchase more than one because 75% of the people who have bought one, came back to buy another. As soon as you read it -- and you probably will finish it in the first two days because this is what most people tell me -- you are going to think of at least 5 other people that you want to have it. So anyway, judge for yourself. Check it out on my website!

To all of my regular bloggers, I apologize for being away for so long. I know you haven't heard from me for a minute. God has really blessed me with a lot more speaking opportunities and publishing clients; plus I wrote the new book that I just mentioned, and just dealing with the orders for that alone have kept me busy. Excuses, excuses... right! Well, I'm here now and I don't ever plan to completely abandon my blog, so don't worry! And I always keep my advice page current even if I don't write any new articles. I have a myspace page now too that I set up specifically to deal with these same topics, especially for the new books. You can check me out at www.myspace.com/sexuallytransmitteddemonsmy user name is "Sex Adviser". Add me as a friend to your myspace page! Here is the new bookcover by the way - Peeeeeace!

In His Power,

Minister Laneen A. Haniah

AKA "Anavah"

Senior Administrator

Christian Sexuality

www.laneenhaniah.com

www.myspace.com/sexuallytransmitteddemons

As James Madison pointed out in his famous 10th essay in The Federalist, "the primary source of danger is the propensity of men to form factions enabling a majority to oppress minorities."

Last weekend saw homosexuals across the world gathering to express their pride.

Dissenters were cavalierly described as extremists and right-wingers. So now its official. If you don't actively endorse this alternative lifestyle, you're automatically labeled homophobic. The voices of those who have moral or societal objections to homosexuality have been rendered moot.

In New York juvenile detention centers, a new policy allows confused sensitive youths to wear girls clothing and be called by feminine names. They can even opt for special housing if other youths discriminate against them as they prance around in skirts and make-up.

In Paris, a fashion show featuring a menswear collection was a hit as they blurred the gender lines, outfitting men in lace, ruffles and make-up.It is now accepted practice for homosexuals to be portrayed in the media in the most flattering light. Most shows feature at least one sensitive soul bravely standing up against mean homophobes. Yeah. And let's not forget the lovely commercial Heinz just launched. They portrayed two men and a young boy as a normal family unit, the two men exchanging a mouth kiss as one heads off to work. I'm still trying to figure out what men swapping spit has to do with the sale of mayonnaise.

As Shmuley Boteach  points out in Disappearing Babies, "Never before in history has civilization skewed more away from the needs of the community and toward the aggrandizement of the individual."

At risk is not only the disintigration of the family but the forced coercion of millions of Americans whose valid objections are completely ignored. Allowing a miniscule portion of our population to set the agenda for the rest of the country is just not right.

*American Spectator, June 2008

Sacremento/June 25, 2012/CNW/

Four of the seven justices repeatedly noted that California voters have futiley defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman, and that the public’s opinion on the matter was now completely irrelevant.

Justice Corrigan indicated that it might be difficult, in any case, to leave the question to the public, whose perception of marriage, she said, is in the process of  being “crushed, shredded and recycled,” (adding an environmentalist focus).

Justice Carlos R. Moreno’s questions did not make clear which way he was leaning. But he asked a lawyer for the city of San Francisco whether the state’s domestic partnerships gave same-sex couples rights equal to those extended to purchasers of other “big-ticket items” like computers and fine furniture.

“It’s not equal, your honor,” said Deputy Frisco City Atty. Therese M. Stewart. “Anyone who is in a relationship with an inanimate object is clearly treated as a second-class citizen,” she said, “regardless of the existence of any warranty. “

Moreno asked, “Doesn’t this just boil down to the use of the “m” word, marriage?”

Stewart replied, “That symbol has deep meaning. We’re just not sure what it is, yet.”

Chief Justice Ronald M. George suggested that the state might want to give mixed-species and inanimate unions a different name because the federal government does not recognize alternative marriage, nor extend income tax exemptions to electronic equipment (regardless of productivity). But he also peppered opponents of open inanimacy with skeptical questions.

One issue the court was clearly wrestling with was whether or not there is a substantive legal difference between a low-tech sexual device and a powered surrogate. “Which is more ‘traditional’??” asked George, betraying a kind of confused frustration.

The court’s decision will resolve a dispute that began in 2008, when the justices struck down California law that limits marriage to a man and a woman, and invited same-sex couples to wed. State advocates of marriage between humans and animals, humans and vegetables and inanimate object unions cried foul and began litigation aimed at ending what they felt was clear discrimination.

The courtroom was packed for the long-awaited hearing, with lawyers for various sides taking turns at the podium. Attorneys for cross-species and Vege-Sexual couples and for San Francisco argued that the state marriage law violated equal protection rights and anti-discrimination laws. Lawyers representing tecnological unions from Silicon Valley added that such laws inhibit innovation in the marketplace, limiting the future, while staff for the attorney general’s and governor’s offices, and for pro-family and religious groups, insisted that cultural tradition justified rejecting what they referred to as “bestiality, fetishism and high-technology sex toys" as the basis for a long-term relationship or adoption of children.

“How can you think of these as ‘marriages’?” asked Virginia Stewart, of the Traditional Values Awareness Project. The Judicial panel just laughed.

A trial judge in San Francisco had ruled in favor of the non-traditional couples, but that decision was overturned 2-1 by a Court of Appeals panel here. The court received dozens of written arguments from law professors, psychologists, parapsychologists, gardeners, zoo-keepers, robot industry professionals, religious groups, pornographers, biographers and civil rights advocates on whether the right to marry should be expanded to include any union between a human being and any identifiable second object, biological, inanimate, or deceased.

The seven-member court has six Republicans and one Democrat, but, as we learned in 2008, that means absolutely nothing anymore.

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

What does the write-up aims to achieve?

·         By captioning it as confidential, the News wants to make it sure that it is read. Confidential means not to be disclosed. The intention here is to invite attention and make everybody read it.

·         This magazine is for teenagers. Letters are presumably fictitious and the answers are contrived to encourage immorality.

·         The style is serpentine. Oh, it is not “socially acceptable.”  But you can get artificial sex organs (vibrators etc.) at ‘pricey shops.’

·        
Religion does not come into it [even if it does, throw it away!]. So go ahead and do it.

·         “It is just a matter of when you can actually use it.”

Muzeeza Ahsan, the editor of the esteemed “Us”, surely recommends the ruptured barrier and now invites young teenage girls to engage in such heinous acts by suggesting sex toys (vibrators etc.)

                               (click)

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

What does the above write-up show?

·         The expression “arch enemy” India is used as a taunt and ridicule – this means there is no enemy in reality; some fanatics have cooked it up.. Here is a method in madness: encourage people to give up their reservations on India and to lower their resolve. It is a well designed effort with the intention to help India against Pakistan.

·         Second, there is an attempted twist to link fasting with lethargy and indolence. Does the Friday Times mean that the Muslims who observe fast in Pakistan close their businesses and offices during Ramadan? And what mileage is Friday Times getting out of it except for cooking up false links and degrading Islam.

·         Third, fasting by implication is an act of hypocrisy and so is the concern for good behavior. But going to India for making obscene gestures to arouse their sexuality is a “pious” deed. Is there an end to perversity?

·         According to this journal, gyrating buttocks, seducing audiences, and “having a good time” is a high moral act in the month of Ramadan. Probably the editor of Friday times wants to conjure up images of his personal fantasies and project them into the minds of the readers!

FAULTLINES EXPOSED!!!

The shaded passages are the reflections of Seema Abbasi and Shehzad Amjad on the love affair of Riffat Afridi and Ahsan. The young woman was a teenager (probably 16-year old). He eloped with her, contrived a marriage document and later received a bullet from one of the girl’s “wronged” relatives.

And what is the News’ reflection:

·         Sex relations (joys of passion) are all right!

·         A 33-year old man can elope with a 16-year old girl, never mind the age difference between the two.

·         Sex relations are a “few moments of divinity” (Divinity means quality of being: the divinity of Christ; of god or goddess)

Would you call it irony or the theater of absurdity that after violating all the moral norms, the writers of the piece feel “morally obliged” to support such cases of irresponsible sex which throws families into violent spasm and shame and destroy the lives of innocent youth!!!

Or is it that Seema Abbasi and Shehzad Amjad are making up for their own personal failings of youth by using Ahsan and Riffat as guinea pigs? – the editorial staff of the esteemed News would know better!!!

The Interfaith Alliance, a far-left religious advocacy group, has accused Scott Lively, a scheduled speaker at this weekend's "Shake the Nation" conference in Boise and Caldwell, of "bearing false witness" and of being "mean-spirited and hurtful."

Lively's crime? In his book, "The Pink Swastika," Lively exposes a secret homosexual activists don't want you to know about Nazi Germany: that although the Nazis did persecute homosexuals, the homosexuals the Nazis persecuted were almost exclusively the effeminate members of the gay community in Germany, and that much of the mistreatment was administered by masculine homosexuals who despised effeminacy in all its forms.

Ludwig Lenz worked at the Sex Research Institute in Berlin, which was destroyed by Hitler's Brown Shirts in 1933 likely because its records, including 40,000 confessions from members of the Nazi Party, would have exposed the sexual perversions of Nazi leadership. Lenz said that "not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal."

In fact, the Nazi Party began in a gay bar in Munich, and Ernst Roehm, Hitler's right hand in the early days of Nazism, was well-known for his taste in young boys. William Shirer says in his definitive "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich," not only that Roehm was "important in the rise of Hitler," but also "like so many of the early Nazis, (he was) a homosexual."

Hitler eventually had Roehm shot, not because he was a homosexual but because his influence over the Brown Shirts made him a political threat to Hitler's control. The Roehm Purge, or "Night of the Long Knives," was largely implemented by homosexuals.

Hitler's Brown Shirts, the dreaded SA, better known as "Storm Troopers," were the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach, and Storm Troopers were almost exclusively homosexual. They also, sadly, comprised most of the leadership of the Hitler Youth, resulting in frequent instances of sexual molestation.

The Brown Shirts were Hitler's enforcers. According to Nazi historian Louis Snyder, Roehm recruited homosexuals into the SA because Roehm felt Germany needed "a proud and arrogant lot who could brawl, carouse, smash windows, kill and slaughter for the hell of it. Straights, in (Roehm's) eyes, were not as adept in such behavior as practicing homosexuals."

Of the Brown Shirts, historian Thomas Fuchs says, "The principle function of this army-like organization was beating up on anyone who opposed the Nazis, and Hitler believed this was a job best undertaken by homosexuals."

Historian H.R. Knickerbocker writes, "Roehm, as the head of 2,500,000 Storm Troops, had surrounded himself with a staff of perverts. His chiefs were almost without exception homosexuals. Indeed, unless a Storm Troop officer were homosexual, he had no chance of advancement."

Most of Hitler's closest aides were homosexuals or sexual deviants. This circle included not only Roehm but the Hitler Youth leader, the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Economics, Hermann Goering (who may not have been homosexual but who liked to dress in drag, paint his nails and put rouge on his cheeks), his personal attorney and his bodyguards. Hitler himself likely functioned as a male prostitute in the days of his youth in Vienna.

Heinrich Himmler, second in power only to Hitler, was publicly opposed to homosexuality but may have been a closet homosexual himself, and served Roehm faithfully and loyally until Roehm fell out of Hitler's favor. Himmler was deeply immersed in the occult, as was Hitler, which led them ultimately to replace every Christian holiday on the German calendar with a pagan counterpart.

In fact, Jews and clergy alike were targets of Nazi wrath. One of the favorite tunes of the Brown Shirts contained this line, "Storm Trooper Comrades, hang the Jews and put the priests against the wall."

In sum, as Lively points out, the masculine homosexual movement in Germany created the Brown Shirts, and the Brown Shirts in turn created the Nazi Party.

There of course is no question that the Nazis rounded up effeminate homosexuals and a great many of them died in slave labor camps as a result of mistreatment and disease. Historians estimate that less than one percent of Europe's homosexual community died at the hands of the Nazis. While even one such death is too many, this pales in comparison to the 85% of Europe's Jews who, unlike homosexuals, were sent to gas chambers.

Many of the guards and administrators responsible for concentration camp horrors were themselves homosexuals. Famous Nazi hunter Elie Weisel was sent to Auschwitz, where he discovered that the head of his part of the camp "loved children," and observed that "there was a considerable traffic in young children among homosexuals there."

A Nazi administrator at Treblinka, according to one historian, "had a harm of little Jewish boys" and "sought in Treblinka only the satisfaction of his homosexual instincts."

In some camps, SS guards would actually sponsor lotteries to see which of the "young attractive homosexuals" would go to whom, while at the same time, according to one historian, they "lashed out with special fury against those who showed effeminate traits." A Pink Triangle survivor said, "The ones who were soft were the ones who suffered terribly."

The "Butch" homosexual guards and capos were capable of unrestrained cruelty, sadism and savagery. A guard at Auschwitz, for instance, strangled, crushed and gnawed to death as many as 100 boys and young men a day while raping them at his leisure.

Historian Frank Rector writes of a film made by the SS "that was secretly made for the enjoyment of a select coterie of Nazis showing a wild drunken orgy of beautiful boys and handsome young men being whipped, raped and murdered by the SS."

Even today in America, it is chic in some homosexual circles for individuals to wear replicas of Nazi Germany uniforms, complete with iron crosses, storm trooper outfits, military boots and even swastikas.

Some parts of the American Nazi movement are explicitly homosexual. The National Socialist League, in fact, at last word restricts its membership to homosexual Nazis.

What's the point here? Simply that there is another side to the constant refrain from homosexual activists who frequently mention the Nazi persecution of homosexuals and in so doing imply that Christians who oppose the normalization of homosexuality are in effect crypto-Nazis.

The truth is that Christians and certain portions of the homosexual community alike had much to fear from the Nazis.

As has been famously said, those who do not study history are condemned to repeat it. Nazi Germany became the horror that it was because it rejected both Christianity and its clear teaching about human sexuality. These are mistakes no sane culture should ever make again.

Stiff Right Jab guest columnist, Bryan Fischer, is Executive Director of the Idaho Values Alliance. He has an undergraduate degree in Philosophy (from Stanford University) and a graduate degree in theology.

Bryan's source: The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party, by Scott Lively, Founders Publishing Foundation, 1995. Online copy with reviews)

Note: Mr. Lively spoke Friday night in Boise, Idaho at the "Shake the Nation" conference on lessons we must learn from Nazi Germany and its disastrous embrace of homosexuality.

Other speakers included former presidential candidate Alan Keyes, author and historian and Stiff Right Jab contributing editor, William Federer, Gregory Thompson (a school superintendent fired for acknowledging God), and Coach Dave Daubenmire (sued by the ACLU for participating in voluntary prayer with athletes).

Ignite My Fire; William Murphy; All Day; Copyright 2005

Do you want more of God? Are you tired of being bound by the same old demons? Are you longing for more intimacy with God? Are you ready to walk in the fullness of your calling and God's power? Don't miss "Intimacy Explosion". It's not another conference; it's an experience. No registration, no fees - just come with expectancy! Click on the picture to go to my website where you can download a printable pdf of the flyer. I expect to see you there!

In  His Power,
Minister Laneen A. Haniah
Anavah - the blog owner and author of
The Spirits of Sexual Perversion Handbook
www.victoriouslyfree.org 

EXCERPT

Some time back I read a fatwa by some alim that the men landing in paradise will get houris and ghilman while the women will only get their husbands. I am deeply distressed since then. I have put up with my husband as a good Muslim wife all these years so that I could go to paradise and partake of the above-mentioned pleasures, but the fatwa has shattered my dreams. Why cant I also have ghilmans…(I am not bothered about houris because I am not into alternate life styles). If, even after going to paradise, I have to content with my husband then it makes a very good case for opting for hell. Please help me resolve this because I don’t want to die an apostate.

Yours disillusioned wife

[Answer]

Since all women are doomed to go to hell anyway, what’s your problem? Come on women, shake a leg. Get on with your earthly desires pronto but make sure that your husband doesn’t catch you in the act. If he does, you’ll get to hell faster than you have bargained for.

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

This letter of a “disillusioned” women (probably a fictitious one) has been used to set up a new social agenda:

·         Women are being told to have extra-marital relations through ‘earthly desires’, Worse! it also promotes adultery and fornication!

·         Keep it secret so that they are not caught. The contrive message has the following ramifications as well:

·         It tells the women that since they are already destined to hell [wonder how?]; so why bother? Give liberal expressions to your sexual urge.

·         Husband-Wife relationship is degraded as the disillusioned wife seems it difficult to digest her distaste about being “content with my husband” even in paradise!

·         It also hits on Islam as an oppressive religion in which women’s destiny is hell and nothing less…

Can the Pakistani Journalist Lobby attest to the above as being fair and true media?

EXCERPT

I am in a real blind. You see I am a die-hard nationalist with an active libido. Lately I read this news that Indian RAW has infiltrated a large group of very beautiful women entrap Pakistani men and glean state secrets from them. The news about the beautiful women ready to jump into the sack really turned me on, but the nationalist streak cautions me against falling prey to their charms. The conflict is getting to me and I don’t know what to do. How can I enjoy these women without betraying my country. Please advise.

Yours confused nationalist

[Answer]

As a fire-brand nationalist, it does not behove you to fall into RAW’s clutches. You must therefore control your raw passions by starting to say your prayers regularly. In the meantime, could you please pass, on the name and address of the beautiful RAQ agents to the edtor of TFT so that he can personally check out the dangers that lurk therein.

FAULTLINES EXPOSED!!!

·         Nationalism is ridiculed and so are the Muslim prayers (salah) – both are seen as an obstruction to “enjoy these women”

·         Lewdness is encouraged by spreading sex without marital obligation.

·         Giving out signals to encourage foreign powers employ this methodology to “glean state secrets”

·         Degrading Pakistan at the hands of RAW – Humiliating Pakistanis to fall prey to a handful of women to reveal state secrets

Such pieces are contrived, mostly in letter-form to carryout the newspaper or magazine’s social agenda.

Is there no end to such false and cooked up stories to degrade military institutions and security agencies in Pakistan?

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

·         This piece is not only poor in taste but also vandalizes our social values by encouraging moral-free attitudes

·         It also suggests that a Pakistani Muslim woman can marry a non-Muslim

·         That we should feel proud at this mismatch.

"Uma parte de mim é permanente
Outra parte se sabe de repente
Uma parte de mim é só vertigem
Outra parte linguagem
Traduzir uma parte na outra parte..."

Após tantos anos, rever esse filme ficou com sabor de primeira vez. E me peguei a pensar em como motivar a turma mais jovem que ainda não assistiu e tão acostumado a outro tipo de ritmo. Pela história em si, até pode ser que uma versão mais atual daria mais velocidade. Até porque não seria mais a Séverine, de Catherine Deneuve. Bela e elegante! Cujo personagem imortalizou-se na imaginação de homens, como também de mulheres de uma geração. Quem sabe de duas.

O lance maior seria que atualmente as "escapulidas" não têm mais o mesmo peso. Embora, em fóruns tenho visto jovens com idéias tão retrógradas, tão preconceituosas, que veriam nisso um pecado. Não que eu concorde também, pois para mim quem tem esse tesão todo por sexo, por orgias sexuais... Deveria romper com o casamento. Ir à luta... O que quero dizer, é o porque dessa personagem cair no gosto popular e dos eruditos também. Creio que o mérito maior é da atriz. Irradiando charme!

Esmiuçando o filme... Tentando não revelar tudo. Há pouco tempo de casada, Séverine sente-se mais que entediada, sente a falta de sexo. Não tem o menor tesão pelo marido (Jean Sorel). Embora a trate com carinho, ele não a satisfaz. Não há o gosto de algo proibido. De algo pecaminoso. Não sabemos se é fruto de sua imaginação, ou não, por lembranças rápidas, nos mostra que passou por abusos sexuais, pequenas carícias por um homem adulto. Seu pai? Pode ser. Se não houve de fato, pode ser para tentar dar a si própria uma justificativa para o fogo atual. Um fogo que só tomará proporção ao saber uma história de uma conhecida do Clube de Tênis. E pelo amigo (Michel Piccoli) do marido que conta da Casa da Madama Anais (Geniviève Page).

Séverine então passa as suas tardes transando com vários homens. Ganhando a alcunha de Belle de Jour. (Revendo o filme agora, não deu para não pensar na música do Alceu Valença.) Para ela, quanto mais rudes, mais prazer sentia. Seu humor com o marido, melhorava a cada dia. Ele completava um lado seu: o de um marido bonito. Pois é, uma inversão de papéis que nesse caso ainda atual: o de marido objeto em vez da mulher. O que não deixa de ter graça perante aos machistas. Voltando ao marido...

Ele nota a mudança dela. Achando que ia tudo bem, fala de terem filhos. Acontece que ser mãe não está nas fantasias dela. Nem nos planos. Ocasionando novos desconfortos entre o casal.

Tudo caminhava a contento, até que um jovem (Pierre Clémenti) se apaixona por ela. Tornando-se obsessivo. Para ela, ele era só mais um homem que a fazia sentir enormes prazeres na cama. Talvez por sentir que está perdendo o companheiro de tráfico, seu comparsa a segue, descobrindo sua verdadeira identidade. Mas antes disso, o amigo de seu marido a flagra num dos quartos da casa da Madama Anais. O que a faz pensar em parar por um tempo. É porque desistir de fato, ela não quer. O jovem vai a sua casa e faz chantagem. Ela consegue ganhar um tempo.

Louco de amor por ela, o jovem resolve, a seu jeito, dar uma solução. Acontece que o resultado foi pior para o lado dele. Para Séverine, veio como uma punição. Peso na consciência. Faltava o tiro de misericórdia. Que veio pelo tal amigo do marido. Alguém que sentia muita inveja do casal.

E no final... não, o certo seria: e o final... pois é, o final poderão alguns ficar sem entender. Para mim, o amigo do marido lhe fez foi um grande favor. Tirando-lhe um peso. Dando a ela a chance de voltar a vida dupla; e sem mais barreiras. Livre, leve e solta.

Não darei nota máxima, porque senti falta de música. No meu imaginário, Paris também tem músicas belas e românticas. Como também quero passar um bom tempo até voltar a assistir. Para sentir o mesmo clima.

Por: Valéria Miguez.

A Bela da Tarde (Belle de Jour). 1967. França. Direção e Roteiro: Luis Buñuel. Elenco: Catherine Deneuve, Jean Sorel, Michel Piccoli, Geniviève Page, Pierre Clémenti. Gênero: Drama. Duração: 100 minutos. Baseado num livro de Joseph Kessel.

FAULTLINES EXPOSED!!!

This campaign for free sex in the disguise of a news item is a favorite exercise of some of our newspapers.

The whole piece is false! For example how did the writer know that “millions” of lovers celebrated Valentine Day in Pakistan?

This is engineering a social situation which is nonexistent in our society. A tiny minority may be practicing the same but that does not justify its place in a daily newspaper.

Bringing up a Pakistani girl’s marriage with an American is mischievous. The message is to go beyond the group and feel free to enjoy anything. Second, it is all right to marry or have sex with foreigners.

FAULTLINES EXPOSED!!!

In this piece, the News writer carries his theme to absurdity. Doubtless, when someone has “foreign” cause to serve, sensitivity and fairness are last.

True! Pakistanis are not angels (the world is neither) but magnifying an isolated incident of a one-year old child’s sexual abuse as “nation-state that continues to exist in a ridiculous time warp” and “fed with total lies” is simply indicative of a sick psychotic mindset which has lost its sense of humanity and proportion. Only pro-Indian bigots and fanatic Indophiles like Shehzad Amjad and the News’ editorial staff can do a thing like this.

His other concern is how to safeguard the image of RAW as a decent Samitarian, harmless even helpful to Pakistan. What is RAW and what it has been doing, he should read Brigadier Tirmidhi’s Profile of Intelligence Agencies and Ashok’s Inside Raw.

What does the News aim at:

·         Demean Pakistan in the eyes of the readers by blowing up an individual incident over Pakistan’s ideology and history

·         Safeguard RAW’s image so that it continues its subversion (read: sectarianism, brutality, unrest, self doubt in the Pakistanis)

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

·         The letter-answer format, without carrying names, is a device to foster sex relations in teenagers

·         The style is empathetic by which emotional prodding is given to teenagers to go through the sex experience.

·         The advise-seeking girl wants to have a “more serious relationship” than mere love talk on the telephone [that is, a physical one] with a boy who is her junior.

·         In most of these responses, the advise-seekers are told to go ahead and do it. The rational is borrowed from the West – that is: you shouldn’t develop complexes; tell him or her that you are interested. Sentences like “be nice” with her or him are often sued in such letters [that is: don’t force it through]

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

Toothless French girls are used for oral sex. It is not only obscene but vulgar as well.

Some people are in situations where they have an unbelieving or backslidden spouse that continuously cheats. For those types of marriages the previous article on this page "Should I Leave My Cheating Husband?" effectively addresses those types of situations. But then there are other people that are in a situation where a good spouse falls into adultery and sincerely wants forgiveness and healing. For those of you in this situation, I encourage all of you to handle it the way that this man handled it in his own marriage. Read on...

 Forgive wrote:

I found out during a marriage conference/retreat that my wife had had an affair. I asked her, and she came clean. I can explain it in no other way than this. God manifested His grace in my life at that moment like no time before (other than when He saved me by His grace). Immediately, I forgave her. She was broken, I was broken. I had always wondered, but not to the extent of suspicion and mistrust. But something that night made me ask, and she knew as well that it was coming out that night. When my worst fear was confirmed, God touched me. She and I would work it out.

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

·         This is perhaps the vulgarist of all such pieces that have become the staple diet of our English Journalism. Shamefully enough the piece gives a reflection of the sick minds of the editorial staff of Pulse.

·         The influence of the West’s feminist movement is obvious. Laurena Bobbit cut her husband’s vital part because he could not indulge in sex with her the way she wanted. The male organ is taken as a symbol of oppression against women: its severance from the male body is an emancipatory act for the women.

·         The writer scandalizes the couple by cooked up scenes that reflect extremely bad taste with least regards to others’ lives.

·         Worse, the piece savors it!

IMPLIED AND STATED OBJECTIVES

·         Sex is perhaps the only important aspect of life. Everything else is secondary.

·         People should flaunt moral norms for they stand in the way of free sex

·         Once this happens the family life will be unhinged from its moral grid, sweeping everything aside held dear and sacred.

Dear Anavah,

Where do I begin? After 30 plus years of marriage, living as a believer the entire time with a husband who lasted maybe two years early on in the marriage as a believer, I am needing sound biblical counsel. I have read your book and it was enlightening and very much on point within these areas of specifics. My husband has dealt in pornography, masturbation, adultery, and drug abuse most of the marriage. He has entered into a deep phase of porn, etc.

We now sleep in separate rooms. His room is like a pig sty. Whenever I step in there for anything, which is rare, I can feel darkness. Some years ago he was in an affair with another woman for several years. At that time I convinced myself to stay for the sake of our children. Once the kids were gone and grown I stayed due to lack of finances after a less than profitable business venture. Now it is simply not wanting to be homeless. The career I have pursued is challenging. I definitely feel a tug from God to become more available to Him, however I feel like I am tied.

Relationally there is only care and concern for my husband as a human being, erotic love has been a non- issue for quite a while now. There are too many diseases to be concerned with. And then the whole soul tie thing -- I feel it’s all coming to a head in some way but I am not sure how. Just recently I had one dream where I felt terror and in my heart knew something terrible had happened to him. I asked Holy Spirit what did the dream mean (and He revealed it to me). In another dream after this one he (my husband) said that he was too far out there. He was screwing children, something he always frowned on others for doing. Now this dream really disturbed me. We have grands. This morning he called my cell phone by mistake thinking it was his drug dealer. I told him he needed to seek treatment and counseling and that he was going down hill.

He claims he wants to stop but his response was he does not feel like counseling will help him, that those places have a high failure rate. To me that is an excuse and he has not fallen deep enough. I feel more compelled to leave now than ever , should I? Voices of guilt are tyring to tell me that Jesus did not give up on me, and how can I spread the word to others when I can’t help the ones in my own house. Laneen he actually says he feels like building a closer relationship with me is the way to get him better. Well I have forgiven him for all of what has been done, but there is a large gulf fixed between us because our core beliefs are opposing. I told him if he sought help I would support him but I would not continue to watch him destroy him self.

I could go on but I won’t. You spoke on these issues in your book, what advice would you give somebody 50 something in this type of situation?

Thanks,
Seeking Answers

Dear Seeking Answers,

I have never taken quite so long to respond to anyone as I have you. Your post made my heart ache and even now my eyes are teary as I write this response to you. This is such a painful situation that you are in and I want you to know that I really prayed and took the time to seek the Holy Spirit's guidance in responding to you. The following is what I believe the Holy Spirit is telling me to share with you.

You asked for Biblical advice so let me start with scripture. You said that your husband lived as a Believer in the earlier part of your marriage. Even though that was a long time ago, once someone has been introduced to The Savior, they cannot void out that experience in their spiritual account. This means that your husband is a backslider as opposed to an unbeliever. So I want to share with you what the Bible says in 1 Cor 5. Paul talks about how to deal with those in your intimate circle that are involved in sexual immorality. He says in verse 5:

"You are to deliverthis man over to satan for physical discipline [to destroy carnal lusts which prompted him to incest (sexual immorality)], that [his] spirit may [yet] be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus."

And then in verses 9-11 it says:    

    "I wrote you in my [previous] letter not to associate [closely and habitually] with unchaste (impure) people--

    Not [meaning of course that you must] altogether shun the immoral people of this world, or the greedy graspers and cheats and thieves or idolaters, since otherwise you would need to get out of the world and human society altogether!

    But now I write to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of [Christian] brother if he is known to be guilty of immorality or greed, or is an idolater [whose soul is devoted to any object that usurps the place of God], (like your husband's drug addiction) or is a person with a foul tongue [railing, abusing, reviling, slandering], or is a drunkard or a swindler or a robber. [No] you must not so much as eat with such a person. (AMP)"

Sister, although your situation is probably the most heartbreaking one that I have read here on the blog, it is not the first time that I have been presented with its kind. The common thread of emotion amongst those in your position is - GUILT. People take upon themselves the burden of  "saving" their wayward spouse. You specifically said that you feel guilty and I can tell you most assuredly that guilt does not come from God but instead comes from satan - even such seemingly "noble" guilt as yours. Guilt breeds condemnation and punishment and the Bible says that there is no condemnation for them that walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit (Rom 8:1).

Seeking Answers, in the book of Hebrews 6:4-6 the Bible tells us,

"4 For it is impossible to bring back to repentance those who were once enlightened those who have experienced the good things of heaven and shared in the Holy Spirit,

 5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the power of the age to come

6 and who then turn away from God. It is impossible to bring such people back to repentance; by rejecting the Son of God, they themselvesare nailing him to the cross once again and holding him up to public shame (NKJV)."

You see, it was never your responsibility to save your husband's soul. For the Bible says that one man plants, another man waters but it is God who gives the increase (1 Cor 3:6-7). Jesus died for your husband's salvation and Jesus alone can save anyone. We are not called to suffer for the salvation of others as Jesus has already suffered for us all in that sense. Once someone becomes a believer it is their own responsibility to grow in the things of God. The scripture above in Hebrews says that "it is impossible" to bring back to repentance one such as your husband. Does this mean that he or those like him can never repent or be restored? Of course not! For with God all things are possible. But it means that you (or any person) cannot bring such a one back to repentance. This is a work that has to be done directly by the hand of The Lord.

So what should we do when we have a person in our life that is no longer walking in the Light? We should do what Paul instructs us to do in the above scriptures in Corinthians my sister. We should "deliverthis man over to satan for physical discipline [to destroy carnal lusts which prompted him to (sexual immorality)], that [his] spirit may [yet] be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus." We should, "not associate (closely and habitually) with anyone (including a spouse) who bears the name of [Christian] brother if he is known to be guilty of immorality or greed, or is an idolater [whose soul is devoted to any object that usurps the place of God], or is a person with a foul tongue [railing, abusing, reviling, slandering], or is a drunkard or a swindler or a robber. [No] you must not so much as eat with such a person."

Seeking Answers, you have a Biblical mandate to remove yourself from the situation that you are in and allow God to deal with your husband in His own way, while preserving your own righteousness and allowing yourself to grow in the Lord unhindered! Not only would it be a good thing to leave, but even more so than that, you are actually in disobedience if you stay! God was even kind enough to warn you in two (2 the number of confirmation) dreams the way things are soon to turn if your husband does not repent and return to the Lord. It is time that you GET OUT OF GOD'S WAY and give Him the liberty that He needs to save both your husband's life and his soul. How will you feel if he dies? How will you feel if he rapes your grands or some other precious child? You've been warned by the Holy Spirit sister and you need to take heed.

I know these are hard sayings, and please don't think that my heart doesn't ache to write them to you, but I do believe that these are the Lord's instructions to you and any man or woman in your situation. Jesus very rarely directly dealt with relationship issues or sexual sin during His ministry on earth, but even He took the time to let us know that in the case of adultery a divorce is often times warranted. This topic must assuredly be of great concern to The Kingdom of Heaven for Jesus to have mentioned it. Jesus' ministry on earth was not so much about teaching people the specifics of how to live the daily Christian life. The Apostles dealt with those issues in the epistles of the Bible. Jesus' assignment was to preach the general truths of Kingdom principles, therefore laying the foundation for The Body of Christ. Yet He took time to teach on divorce and adultery saying these things:

"Jesus said, "Moses provided for divorce as a concession to your hard heartedness, but it is not part of God's original plan. I'm holding you to the original plan, and holding you liable for adultery if you divorce your faithful wife (or husband) and then marry someone else. I make an exception in cases where the spouse has committed adultery. (Mat 19:8, MSG)"

Does this mean that you are commandedto divorce your husband? No it does not. Jesus' teachings on adultery were really pointing more toward God's passionate hatred for divorce. Yet in that hatred for divorce, He did not want anyone to feel bound by Him to stay married to an adulterous spouse. Adultery is birthed out of the wickedness and lustfulness of a person's heart (Mat 15:19) and breaks the marriage covenant. Therefore anyone married to one that has committed adultery is released from that covenant with God's blessing. But whether, you sister, divorce or not that is your choice. However, a legal separation is a mandate from God.

And in terms of supporting your husband in his supposed decision to get clean, the only support you should be offering him is to under gird him in prayer and to bless him with your mouth. You have given him 30+ years of support which he trampled under foot and wasted. If you were able to help him Sis, his deliverance would have been effectively accomplished and manifested a long time ago. There is nothing you can do to help your husband except getting out of his life and out of God's way! If he is really ready for a change, God is more than capable of being all of the support and comfort your husband needs.

Lastly, in terms of your fear about leaving I simply say - TRUST GOD. "Trust in the LORD with all your heart, And lean not on your own understanding; In all your ways acknowledge Him, And He shall direct your paths. (Prov 3:5-6, NKJV)" God shall supply all of your needs according to His riches in glory (Phil 4:19).  He took care of Hagar in the wilderness when Abraham sent her away (Gen 21:8-20). Surely He will take care of you. Don't let doubt and unbelief be an excuse to stay in this situation. God will provide the means that you need to make a complete separation from your husband if you are really willing in your heart to be obedient. And by the way, did you know that the spirit of pornography brings on poverty? Your business will never succeed as long as you stay with this man. You think staying with him is a means of provision, but it is really a means of  poverty.

Sister, you said that God is calling you closer but you feel "tied". If your right eye offends you cut it out (Mat 5:29). Seeking Answers, DON'T MAKE ANY EXCUSES for why you can't get closer to God. I know that it's hard, but if you are willing to make the sacrifice and stop saying "I can't" but instead say "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me (Phil 4:13)" you will grow in your walk with the Lord. You will never make it through this painful transition that you are about to go through without a close and intimate walk with God. And further more, in order to be able to really effectively pray for your husband and your children and grands (that they may be delivered from generational curses) you are going to need the Holy Spirit to rise up in you in a mighty way.

I pray you receive this Now Word for your situation and allow it to empower you to walk in a new season. My prayers are with you.

In  His Power,
Minister Laneen A. Haniah
Anavah - the blog owner and author of
The Spirits of Sexual Perversion Handbook
www.victoriouslyfree.org 

Looking for a previous article? Click Here

Want to share a testimony? Click Here

Need advice about something? Click Here     

If you are interested in being a moderator or author for this weblog please  e-mail me at laneenhaniah@victoriouslyfree.org     

(Please be advised that if you post a comment to any article on this weblog, you will automatically be added to the mailing list, receiving weekly updates about this site. If you do not want to be automatically added to this list all you have to do is add this phrase in parenthesis at the beginning of your first comment only: “I do not wish to be added to the mailing list”. You only have to add this phrase to the very first comment you post. It will protect you from receiving updates. Thank you for your cooperation. ) 

No meio desse caminho tinha mais que uma pedra...

Um filme que expõem os instintos animalescos dos homens. Perversos, até. O outro lado oculto. Que é deflagrado por justamente não querer racionalizá-lo.

Uma frase pontua a história: "O tempo arruina tudo." O outro lado da moeda - a face oculta. Pois visto por num outro ângulo o tempo edifica. Mas não é disso que o filme fala.

O filme deixa alguma indagações, mas que estariam mais num plano real; e não no contexto do filme. Entretanto, um deles seria em uma jovem usar uma passagem subterrânea, sozinha, e à noite. Se de dia já é assustador.

A história é contada de trás para a frente. Basicamente é um dia na vida de três pessoas. Um dia que ficará marcado para sempre. E que não terá mais volta.

Mesmo que queiram rever seus próprios conceitos que disseram de forma até descontraída a caminho de uma festa... Viram, sentiram, vivenciaram um outro lado nessa noite fatídica. Algo que nem sonharam. Opa! A jovem sonhara com algo. Presságios? Ou sinais desperdiçados ao longo do dia?

Uma jovem, um ex-namorado e o atual são os protagonistas dessa história. E um causador da barbárie com a jovem. Mas teria saído incólume dessa? Logo ele?

Ódio. Vingança. Violência gerando violência. Estariam certos, os dois jovens, a agirem como agiram? Daria satisfação a quem? Ou a que? O mal já estava feito. Não teria sido melhor entregá-lo a polícia?

O filme levanta um outro ponto: no quesito promiscuidade. Tanto no inferninho, como na festa do apartamento, rolava sexo e drogas. Em doses diferentes? Sim. Mas que não deixava de levar a uma mesma intenção: o prazer carnal. E amoral. Então, em ambas, as conseqüências não tardam.

Atentem para a conversa dos três a caminho da festa. E por um pedido em especial feito pelo namorado a Alex ao acordarem. São falas que... que o estupro destrói tudo e de modo irreversível. É no que virá depois, no "acordar" daquele dia/noite... que impressionam muito mais...

Ah! Para quem ainda não viu, há duas cenas chocantes! Enfim, pode até ser que eu venha a rever, mas por enquanto, nem pensar. Nota: 08.

Por: Valéria Miguez.

Irreversível (Irréversible). França. 2002. Direção e Roteiro: Gaspar Noé. Com: Monica Bellucci, Vincent Cassel, Albert Dupontel. Gênero: Drama, Suspense. Duração: 99 minutos. Classificação: 18 anos.

Reparto principal:
Catherine Deneuve ... Séverine Serizy (Belle de Jour)
Jean Sorel ... Pierre Serizy
Michel Piccoli ... Henri Husson
Geneviève Page ... Madame Anais
Francisco Rabal ... Hyppolite
Pierre Clémenti ... Marcel
Maria Latour ... Mathilde
Françoise Fabian ... Charlotte

Fotografía:
Sacha Vierny

Montaje:
Louisette Hautecoeur

Palabras clave:
Adult Humor, Attempted Murder, Based On Novel, Beach, Bedroom, Belt, Blonde, Bondage, boredom, Bouquet, Broken Glass, Brothel, Car Accident, Card Playing, Casket, Castle, Champagne, Cherry Brandy, Cigarette Smoking, Clandestine, Coach, Coma, Couple, Crossword Puzzle, Cult Favorite, Daydream, Decadence, Dominatrix, Double Life, Drama, Dream, Enigmatic, Erotic Drama, Erotica, Fantasy, Fantasy Sequence, fantasy-sexual, Female Nudity, Fireplace, Gangster, Horse And Buggy, Hotel, husband, Infidelity, Lingerie, Madam, Masochist, Mindbenders, Mud, newlywed, Not For Children, Paris France, Park, Peep Hole, Playing Footsie, Police Officer, Prostitute, prostitute/prostitution, Prostitutes, Prostitution, Psycho Sexual, Psychological Drama, Rain, Satire, Satirical, Scar, Schoolgirl, Semiautomatic Pistol, Sexual Perversion, Sexual Situations, Sexy, Shot To Death, Shovel, Shower Scene, Ski Resort, Slap In The Face, Stalker, Stylized, Sunglasses, Surreal, Surrealism, Taxi Driver, Taxi Ride, Teeth, Unreliable Narration, Whipping, Witty, Woods, Wry, Young Girl