<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>safari-31 &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/safari-31/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "safari-31"</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:42:53 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox 3, il miglior browser]]></title>
<link>http://markarg.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/firefox-3-il-miglior-broswer/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
<guid>http://markarg.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/firefox-3-il-miglior-broswer/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Il 17 Giugno 2008 è il Download Day. La Mozilla Corporation tenta il record mondiale di download ne]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Il 17 Giugno 2008 è il Download Day. La Mozilla Corporation tenta il record mondiale di download nel giorno d'uscita di un programma. Questo Blog aderisce all'iniziativa e vi invita ad <a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/it/firefox/" target="_blank">effettuare il donwload di Firefox 3</a>.</p>
<p align="justify">Se siete già degli utilizzatari del browser di casa Mozilla conoscerete i moltiplici vantaggi del <em>Panda Rosso</em> (a differenza di quanto molti credano, la parola <em>Firefox</em> non significa <em>volpe di fuoco</em>, ma indica il Panda rosso, che in inglese viene appunto chiamato anche <em>firefox</em>. Tuttavia il logo di Mozilla Firefox sembra che raffiguri l'immagine di una volpe con la coda infuocata, e lo stesso autore del logo, Jon Hicks, ha dichiarato di essersi ispirato ad un disegno giapponese raffigurante un panda, da Wikipedia) e se non lo siete vi invito oggi stesso a migrare al miglior browser in circolazione, in attesa delle pubblicazioni di Internet Explorer 8 e Safari 4.</p>
<p align="justify">Firefox 3 porta con sé miglioramenti all'interfaccia utente, inclusi cambiamenti al look and feel della versione per Windows Vista, XP, Mac OS X e Linux; correzioni e modifiche a funzionalità quali l'autocompletamento degli indirizzi, il backup e ripristino dei bookmark e lo zoom a piena pagina; correzioni e miglioramenti alla piattaforma per incrementare sicurezza, compatibilità con il Web e stabilità; e ulteriori migliorie alle performance, soprattutto relative al motore JavaScript.</p>
<p align="justify">Per leggere un articolo dettagliato sulle novità di Firefox 3 <a href="http://punto-informatico.it/2322909/PI/News/Speciale--Firefox-3-vuole-governare-il-Web/p.aspx" target="_blank">clicca qui</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wordpress Update!]]></title>
<link>http://hochbrian.wordpress.com/?p=34</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hochbrian</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hochbrian.wordpress.com/?p=34</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hey everybody,
WordPress updated their software and have now rolled the update out to everybody who ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everybody,</p>
<p>Wordpress updated their software and have now rolled the update out to everybody who uses wordpress.com. One of the nicest things about the new update is that it works with Safari 3.1! Previously, I could use Safari to post but it didn't work very well.  For instance, line breaks would not work.  No matter how many times I pressed return the line would keep on flowing without so much as entering a space.</p>
<p>Hoorah!</p>
<p>—Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Quièn es màs rapido? Firefox 3 Beta 5 o Safari 3.1?]]></title>
<link>http://kessuser.wordpress.com/?p=32</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>frantom255</dc:creator>
<guid>http://kessuser.wordpress.com/?p=32</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
Pues parece que nadie se pone de acuerdo, ya que por una parte tenemos un análisis de zdnet, en el]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="http://noticiastech.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/sunspider-ff3b5-macosx.jpg" /></div>
<div align="left">Pues parece que nadie se pone de acuerdo, ya que por una<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1650"><b> parte tenemos un análisis de zdnet,</b></a> en el que afirma de que el Firefox 3.0 beta 5 utiliza menos cantidad de memoria que la última versión del Safari (para ser exactos un 7%) además de ser más rápido…y por otra parte tenemos <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/04/03/firefox-3b5-fastest-browser-on-mac-os-x-depends-on-the-test"><b>a Ars Technica, que dice que el Safari </b></a>sigue siendo más rápido que el Firefox (aunque este tiene una mejor velocidad en Javascript), aunque parece que hace una serie de pruebas más completas: Javascript, cargando el DOM, presentando gráficas, etc.</p>
<p>Igualmente los usuarios de Firefox continuan con su firme opinion sobre que el mismo Firefox siempre serà el mejor...</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safari 3.1 Piggybacks In Sofware Update]]></title>
<link>http://ithreats.wordpress.com/2008/04/02/safari-31-piggybacks-in-sofware-update/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Methusela Cebrian Ferrer</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ithreats.wordpress.com/2008/04/02/safari-31-piggybacks-in-sofware-update/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;Piggybacking is a method used to gain unauthorized access to the computer. This occurs when ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_5MH3NxS8hN8/R_Qb2sQAuNI/AAAAAAAAAY0/b_e_XGytQtA/s1600-h/safari_piggybacks.PNG"><img style="display:block;text-align:center;cursor:pointer;margin:0 auto 10px;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_5MH3NxS8hN8/R_Qb2sQAuNI/AAAAAAAAAY0/b_e_XGytQtA/s400/safari_piggybacks.PNG" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-style:italic;">"Piggybacking is a method used to gain unauthorized access to the computer. This occurs when an authorize application allows </span><span style="font-style:italic;"> another non-related or unauthorized application to pass through or get into user's system."</span></div>
<div style="text-align:justify;">Couple of weeks ago while I was working in my infect machine, I got this alert message from Apple Software Update. I was a little bit busy so I just minimize the window. Last monday, I had the chance to check and read what it says. Surprisingly, I found Safari 3.1 in the list which I know I haven't installed any of its version. So, what's happening here ?</p>
<p><a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_5MH3NxS8hN8/R_SNgMQAuQI/AAAAAAAAAZM/wFtue0w1JoQ/s1600-h/piggyback.PNG"><img style="display:block;text-align:center;cursor:pointer;margin:0 auto 10px;" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_5MH3NxS8hN8/R_SNgMQAuQI/AAAAAAAAAZM/wFtue0w1JoQ/s400/piggyback.PNG" border="0" alt="" /></a>As shown in the figure above, the QuickTime program I installed checks for updates. Then, the server replied with the update information. However, it doesn't end there, the server exploited the communication to perform an unauthorized task, which is to offer Safari 3.1 installer.</p>
<p>This is completely unacceptable behavior and a breach to information security.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Technology News]]></title>
<link>http://librarian2008.wordpress.com/?p=141</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>thelibrarian2008</dc:creator>
<guid>http://librarian2008.wordpress.com/?p=141</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The best research tools from libraries
Blogging can help someone feel less isolated and more satisfi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/324fgj" target="_new">The best research tools from libraries</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/03/03/2178512.htm" target="_new">Blogging can help someone feel less isolated and more satisfied</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2260070,00.asp">157 of the best free software</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2270412,00.asp" target="_new">Tips for trouble-shooting your PC</a></p>
<p><a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/apple/08/03/27/129236.shtml" target="_new">Safari 3.1 vulnerable to hacks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safari FW desde Apple Software Update]]></title>
<link>http://safariforwindows.wordpress.com/?p=26</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Juan Ángel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://safariforwindows.wordpress.com/?p=26</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
Apple ha llevado a cabo una estrategia que nadie ha dejado escapar. En Apple Software Update, el pr]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://alt1040.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/wsafari.jpg" height="392" width="300" /></div>
<p>Apple ha llevado a cabo una estrategia que nadie ha dejado escapar. En Apple Software Update, el programa de actualización de programas de la manzana en Windows, ha incluido la instalación de Safari 3.1 como otra más de esas actualizaciones.</p>
<p>¿Criticable? Bueno, no es impuesta su instalación ni a nadie creo que le moleste, así que en mi opinión es tan solo una <i>peculiar manera de hacer publicidad.</i> No entiendo, por tanto, el revuelo que ha habido en torno a ello.</p>
<p>Visto en <a href="http://www.applesfera.com/2008/03/22-apple-inmiscuye-safari-en-el-software-update-de-windows">Applesfera</a> y <a href="http://alt1040.com/2008/03/la-polemica-de-apple-safari-y-el-actualizador-de-software-en-windows/">ALT1040</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safari es legal en Windows]]></title>
<link>http://tecnologiadehoy.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/safari-es-legal-en-windows/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>igonzalezyauck</dc:creator>
<guid>http://tecnologiadehoy.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/safari-es-legal-en-windows/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Una errata en la licencia de uso del nuevo Safari 3.1 para Windows ha hecho que muchos medios hayan ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Una errata en la licencia de uso del nuevo Safari 3.1 para Windows ha hecho que muchos medios hayan comunicado erróneamente que podría existir un curioso problema legal con este navegador, pero no es así. De hecho, lo más importante no es este equívoco, sino el nuevo sistema de renderizado de fuentes.</i><!--more--></p>
<p>Mientras que en pasadas versiones del motor WebKi, Safari no mostraba bien las tipografías en Windows, la última versión del navegador de Apple ha incluido una importante mejora: soporte para el uso de <a href="http://webkit.org/blog/168/gdi-text-on-windows/" target="_blank">Windows GDI</a>, o lo que es lo mismo, no más problemas con las tipografías en sistemas Windows.</p>
<p>Este importante soporte ha sido ensombrecido por la polémica surgida a raíz de una frase mal expresada de la licencia de uso de Safari 3.1, que parecía especificar que era ilegal usar Safari en Windows, algo inexplicable que solo excluiría casos como ejecutarlo a través de BootCamp o de un programa de virtualización. Sin embargo, en Ars Technica se pusieron en contacto con los responsables de Apple, que poco después les confirmaron que, efectivamente, la licencia contenía un error.</p>
<h6>Fuente: www.theinquirer.es</h6>
<h6></h6>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Safari 3.1. Os problemas de segurança ja começaram]]></title>
<link>http://snnangola.wordpress.com/?p=366</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>snnangola</dc:creator>
<guid>http://snnangola.wordpress.com/?p=366</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
 A Apple devia ter um pouco de mais cautela ao adotar um método agressivo ao quase obrigar a inst]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://images.apple.com/safari/images/interface20070611.png" align="middle" height="282" width="282" /></p>
<p> A Apple devia ter um pouco de mais cautela ao adotar um método agressivo ao <a href="http://snnangola.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/apple-aprende-a-sacanagem-geral-com-updateinstall-meio-forcado-do-safari/">quase obrigar</a> a instalação do seu Browser o Safari em maquinas Windows através duma actualização do Itunes. Como a tempestade nao vem apenas com água mas traz uma serie de problemas atrás eis que surgem ja <a href="http://secunia.com/advisories/29483/">duas vulnerabilidades de segurança</a> que permitem execução de codigo arbitrario na maquina alvo.</p>
<p>A primeira está relacionada na forma como o Safari maneja mal nomes longos de arquivos sendo baixados. A segunda tem a ver com a possibilidade de se realizar Spoofing de websites confiaveis colocando em risco usuarios iniciantes, além duma possivel capacidade de se realizar phishing.</p>
<p>Ao que consta até agora a solução da Apple é uma recomendação de se manter afastado de websites ditos 'nao confiaveis'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safari 3.1 on Windows Problems Displaying A Background Image On a Body Tag]]></title>
<link>http://blueclock.wordpress.com/?p=221</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>blueclock</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blueclock.wordpress.com/?p=221</guid>
<description><![CDATA[[UPDATE: panic over. Let's just call it user error/stupidity and assume that they won't be naming a ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[UPDATE: panic over. Let's just call it user error/stupidity and assume that they won't be naming a bug after me.]</p>
<p>I'm currently developing a site that uses a very common technique of tiling a background image on the body tag in css.</p>
<p>I tested the site in Safari 3.1 for Windows and  the image would not display. It works fine in all other browsers.</p>
<p>I then moved the css for the background image into a div tag that wraps the entire site and hey presto it works as expected. I didn't give it much more though until just now.</p>
<p>I've just been to look at Adobe's new Photoshop Express website in Safari 3.1 for windows and they have exactly the same problem. Nice to know I'm in good company!</p>
<p>They are using the same technique e.g.</p>
<div class="panelNode panelNode-stylesheet">
<div class="cssRule insertInto">
<div class="cssHead">
<pre><span class="cssSelector">body</span> {</pre>
</div>
<div class="cssProp editGroup">
<pre><span class="cssPropName editable">background-image</span><span class="cssColon">:</span><span class="cssPropValue editable">url(assets/landing/background.jpg)</span><span class="cssSemi">;</span></pre>
</div>
<div class="cssProp editGroup">
<pre><span class="cssPropName editable">background-repeat</span><span class="cssColon">:</span><span class="cssPropValue editable">repeat</span><span class="cssSemi">;</span></pre>
</div>
<div class="editable insertBefore">
<pre>}</pre>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>Is anyone else experiencing this?</p>
<p>I can't show you my site as it's still in development, but the Photoshop Express site is here <a href="http://www.photoshop.com/express/landing.html" title="Photoshop Express">www.photoshop.com/express/landing.html   </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Three Reasons I am Sticking with Firefox over Safari 3.1]]></title>
<link>http://mcglaysia.wordpress.com/?p=20</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mcglaysia</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mcglaysia.wordpress.com/?p=20</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I love my Mac.  I really do.  I loved my MacBook and now I love my Macbook Pro.  I prefer OSX to ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my Mac.  I really do.  I loved my MacBook and now I love my Macbook Pro.  I prefer OSX to XP or the various Linux flavours I have tried and I like the iLife suite.  I kept my blog using iWeb for awhile and most of the feedback I got when I switched to WordPress was that folks liked the iWeb one better in terms of looks.  So I guess I am a fanboy.  So, when Safari 3.1 came out and people said it was fast, I downloaded it right away and moved all my bookmarks over from Firefox 3.  Safari would be the perfect browser.  Sleek, clean, fast, with all the features I could need.</p>
<p>After only a few days I returned to Firefox. Here's why:</p>
<p>1. Multi-tabbed Home:</p>
<p>In Firefox I have my three favorite starting places set as my Home pages.  Call me greedy, but I open these three sites every time I get on the web, so I might as well have my browser open them right away, no?  Safari wouldn't let me.  At least I couldn't figure out how.</p>
<p>2. RSS subscription handling:</p>
<p>When I find a new site I want to subscribe to, I want to add it to my iGoogle page.  It's my main home page and I like to see all my RSS feeds on that page.  A great new feature of Safari 3.1 is the way it handles RSS feeds right in Safari, but I want to have a choice as to where I read my feeds.  Safari doesn't ask me.  This reminds me of why I switched from using iWeb to WordPress.  Control.  Steve Jobs makes things nice and easy for folks, but he is a bit of a control freak.  This is not news to anyone I am sure, but I do get frustrated when I grow beyond the nice and easy ilife stuff and go looking for where I can save my iWeb as HTML and its just not there.  Or when I want to set Safari to let me add my RSS subscriptions to my iGoogle page and it just does what it wants.  Firefox asks me nicely if I want to add a new feed to iGoogle or Google Reader.  Thanks Firefox.</p>
<p><a href="http://mcglaysia.wordpress.com/files/2008/03/picture-2.png" title="thanks firefox"><img src="http://mcglaysia.wordpress.com/files/2008/03/picture-2.thumbnail.png" alt="thanks firefox" /></a></p>
<p>3. Downloads Button:</p>
<p>Finally, (and this is a little thing but I use it a lot) there's the "Downloads" button on my Firefox toolbar.</p>
<p><a href="http://mcglaysia.wordpress.com/files/2008/03/picture-1.png" title="downloads button"><img src="http://mcglaysia.wordpress.com/files/2008/03/picture-1.png" alt="downloads button" /></a></p>
<p>I like this button. I missed it in Safari.  I download things a lot.  Maybe I am funny that way.  But I like to check on their progress and I like having this little button right up there where I can get to it without having to go to the Window menu and choose Downloads.  Too many clicks, that.  So I tried adding a button like that to my Safari toolbar.  No can do.</p>
<ol></ol>
<p>I have not mentioned plug-ins (Firefox has them and Safari doesn't) or GreaseMonkey scripts (ditto) because I don't use them.  But It is nice to know that I can, if I want, seek out a new feature and install it in Firefox.</p>
<p>For me, these things, while not terribly important, are enough to make me use Firefox 3 over Safari 3.1.  They are small things, but they are important to me.  If anyone can tell me in the comments how to set Safari to open several tabs when it launches or add a new tolbar button for the Downloads window I guess I might give Safari another try.  Otherwise, I might as well use the one that does what I want. Right?  Sorry Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safari 3.1 ]]></title>
<link>http://usba.wordpress.com/?p=13</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>usba</dc:creator>
<guid>http://usba.wordpress.com/?p=13</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I recently downloaded safari 3.1 since it came up in the apple auto updater . Saying that its ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently downloaded safari 3.1 since it came up in the apple auto updater . Saying that its "the worlds fastest browser" and all that . So I downloaded it to test it out.I cant really see the difference  since I use firefox there wasn't much diffrence in speed. On some websites it was faster but on some there would be a pause for a bit , but thats it . Its got a nice, clean and easy looking  interface.  It all show  got  this feature called snap back  where you can go back to the begging of the  web page where you started or  the search . It all show got a auto fill...ect . Nothing really special about it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safari 3.1: Olvídate de la palabra "beta"]]></title>
<link>http://safariforwindows.wordpress.com/?p=24</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Juan Ángel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://safariforwindows.wordpress.com/?p=24</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
Ayer, curiosamente, me había pasado como hacía tiempo que no lo hacía por el blog, y me dije que]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://safariforwindows.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/sshot-1.png" width="400" /></div>
<p style="text-align:left;">Ayer, curiosamente, me había pasado como hacía tiempo que no lo hacía por el blog, y me dije que los de Cupertino se habían olvidado de su navegador para Win. Pues mira tú, casualidades de la vida, descubro minutos después que Apple acaba de liberar Safari 3.1. Y le quitan la etiqueta de "beta".</p>
<p>He estado un buen rato probándolo y he de decir que es un placer usarlo. Una pena que le falten funcionalidades de Firefox como los tan ansiados complementos (echo en falta AdBlock), y no se pueden importar/exportar ni historial ni feeds.</p>
<p>Aún así podemos notar una mejora en la estabilidad (creo que la característica más destacable), y la creo que aparición de utilidades para desarrolladores en la nueva pestaña "Desarrollo". Y un auténtico placer lo de arrastrar archivos y la integración con iTunes. Me quedo en Safari hasta que necesite Firefox, he dicho.</p>
<p>¡Ah! Y, al fin, en español.</p>
<p>Descarga &#124; <a href="http://www.apple.com/es/safari/download/">Safari 3.1</a><a href="http://www.apple.com/es/safari/download/"></a><a href="http://www.apple.com/es/safari/download/"></a></p>
<p>Más información &#124; <a href="http://www.apple.com/es/safari/">Apple - Safari</a> (en inglés aún estando en la página española)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[NUEVO SAFARI 3.1]]></title>
<link>http://enbinario.wordpress.com/?p=63</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jlbeta</dc:creator>
<guid>http://enbinario.wordpress.com/?p=63</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
Esta version para Windows si abre apple.com
Apple acaba de lanzar la nueva versión 3.1 de su naveg]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://images.apple.com/safari/images/hero20070611.png" height="429" width="518" /></div>
<p>Esta version para Windows si abre apple.com</p>
<p>Apple acaba de lanzar la nueva versión 3.1 de su navegador: Safari. Disponible también para Windows esta versión promete abrir las paginas webs mucho mas rapido que los acuales 2 navegadores más populares (IE y FF), además de ejecutar JavaScript hasta seis veces más rápido que sus competidores.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/" target="_blank">Descarga Safari 3.1</a></p>
<p>fuente: <a href="http://www.vnunet.es/Actualidad/Noticias/Inform%C3%A1tica_personal/Mac/20080318017" target="_blank">vnunet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Testing with safari]]></title>
<link>http://trugiaz.wordpress.com/?p=112</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>trugiaz</dc:creator>
<guid>http://trugiaz.wordpress.com/?p=112</guid>
<description><![CDATA[On my last post, I was trying to use flock to post a writing to this blog, which is done successf]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my <a href="http://trugiaz.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/a-trial/" target="_blank">last post</a>, I was trying to use <a href="http://www.flock.com" target="_blank">flock</a> to post a writing to this blog, which is done successfully (and beautifully, even though I still couldn't post a picture using its web clipboard. To tell you the truth, I was always using my <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/" target="_blank">firefox</a> (version 2) to writing my post. Not because I hate Safari, but when it comes to blog posting in Wordpress, it sucks.And then yesterday the Apple have upgraded their safari to version <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/" target="_blank">3.1</a>, now I'm trying to use safari to blog posting, and will see the outcome as soon as I finished writing this.  <a href="http://trugiaz.wordpress.com/files/2008/03/picture-2.png" title="Wordpress on Safari"><img src="http://trugiaz.wordpress.com/files/2008/03/picture-2.thumbnail.png" alt="Wordpress on Safari" /></a>Thumbnail above is how the posting should appear in my blog, I'll update you guys how it appear actually in my blog.<span style="font-style:italic;" class="Apple-style-span">Update: This is what actually what's coming out</span>  <a href="http://trugiaz.wordpress.com/files/2008/03/picture-5.png" title="Wordpress on Safari"><img src="http://trugiaz.wordpress.com/files/2008/03/picture-5.thumbnail.png" alt="Wordpress on Safari" /></a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Appel's internet browser, Safari!]]></title>
<link>http://handigzeg.wordpress.com/2008/03/18/appels-internet-browser-safari/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>handigzeg</dc:creator>
<guid>http://handigzeg.wordpress.com/2008/03/18/appels-internet-browser-safari/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
’s Werelds populairste browser van Apple is naast het besturingssysteem Mac Os nu ook voor Wind]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src="http://images.apple.com/safari/download/images/hero20080318.png" height="157" width="383" /><br />
’s Werelds populairste browser van Apple is naast het besturingssysteem Mac Os nu ook voor Windows beschikbaar. Safari word standaard geleverd op alle nieuwe Macintosh computers. De versie van Safari wordt ook wel Safari RSS genoemd, omdat er een volledige RSS reader is ingebouwd.</p>
<p>In versie 3.1 van Safari is er voor de rest niet veel veranderd die je kunt zien. In de software zijn wel een aantal dingen aangepast. Zo is er een beveiligingslek weggepoetst  er is aan de stabiliteit, compatibiliteit en de performance van javascript gewerkt.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/download/http://www.apple.com/safari/download/">Download Safari Browser 3.1</a> [18,6 mb]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Released Safari 3.1]]></title>
<link>http://epiac1216.wordpress.com/?p=128</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Omar Upegui R.</dc:creator>
<guid>http://epiac1216.wordpress.com/?p=128</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m glad to spread the word that Apple Inc. announced this morning that Safari 3.1 is ready to]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><img src="http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b389/epiac1216/Apple%20Logos/Apple.jpg" align="left" border="1" height="67" width="111" />I'm glad to spread the word that <b>Apple Inc. </b>announced this morning that <b>Safari 3.1</b> is ready to download at its main <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/download/">web site.</a></p>
<p align="justify">According to Apple's staff,  Safari 3.1 is the world’s fastest web browser for Mac and Windows PCs.  In addition to loading web pages 1.9 times faster than Internet Explorer 7 and 1.7 times faster than Firefox 2, Safari 3.1 runs JavaScript up to six times faster than other browsers.</p>
<p align="justify">It's to be noted that several tests have been made comparing the performance speed of Firefox 3 Beta 4 with other well known web browsers, and every time it came in first.  The specific test was Apple's <b>SunSpider JavaScript </b>and these were the results of the first three places:</p>
<div align="justify">
<ol>
<li>Firefox 3 Beta 4:  6,972.2 ms</li>
<li>Safari 3.1:  7,411.8 ms</li>
<li>Opera 9.5.9807 Beta:  10,824.0</li>
</ol>
<p>As you can clearly see, Firefox 3 is still the <i>"king of the hill"</i> regarding speed and a lot of other features as well.</div>
<p align="justify">Available for free download for Mac OS X and Windows, Safari 3.1 is also the browser to support the latest innovative web standards needed to deliver the next generation of highly interactive Web 2.0 experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safari 3.1]]></title>
<link>http://howgoodisthat.wordpress.com/?p=154</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jim Gardner</dc:creator>
<guid>http://howgoodisthat.wordpress.com/?p=154</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Apple has released Safari 3.1 for Windows and Mac.
Among it&#8217;s many stability and security impr]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://howgoodisthat.wordpress.com/files/2008/03/safari31.png' alt='safari31.png' align="right" />Apple has released Safari 3.1 for Windows and Mac.</p>
<p>Among it's many stability and security improvements, Safari 3.1 boasts being the fastest and easiest to use browser for Windows as well as being a vast improvement on the already impressive Mac version.</p>
<p>Download the best browser money can't buy, for Windows and Mac, from <a href="http://apple.com/safari">apple.com/safari</a> now!  -- Give it a week, and you'll wonder how you lived without it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safari 3.1]]></title>
<link>http://tubetone.wordpress.com/?p=159</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tubetone</dc:creator>
<guid>http://tubetone.wordpress.com/?p=159</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8230;still doesn&#8217;t work with WordPress&#8230;
Boo.
*turns off the visual rich editor&#8230; ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...still doesn't work with Wordpress...</p>
<p>Boo.</p>
<p>*turns off the visual rich editor... AGAIN*  Seriously ... dude ... hand-coding html is so ... like ... 90's.</p>
<p>Post Script - The conspiracy nut in me wonders if they don't fix this on purpose because, as Mac users, we're "supposed" to be using their iLife application for blogging....</p>
<p> </p>
<p>UPDATE:<br />
WordPress' <a href="http://wordpress.com/blog/2008/04/04/new-dashboard/">new dashboard</a> uses TinyMCE 3.0 and seems to have fixed everything.  Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safari 3.1 Out: First Impression]]></title>
<link>http://macpokeruk.wordpress.com/?p=46</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>pokerstarsmarketingcode</dc:creator>
<guid>http://macpokeruk.wordpress.com/?p=46</guid>
<description><![CDATA[So Apple just released Safari 3.1 today.  I just downloaded it from apple.com/safari.  First impress]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Apple just released Safari 3.1 today.  I just downloaded it from apple.com/safari.  First impression...everything looks the same but God damn it's fast.  I still like the look of Firefox better but Apple says its 1.7 times faster than Firefox and yes I believe it.  I still use Firefox mainly for things like blog posting and website stuff but I'm writing this post in Safari just to test it out to see if there is any difference.  You can actually see the "upload" "Choose file" button now for pictures...it's about time.</p>
<p>Trying to use the "code" button funks everything up.  It takes out all formatting so Safari is still basically useless on Wordpress.  Actually I just had to copy and past this over to firefox because it even dis-formats your post when you try to publish.</p>
<p>I think I'll have to download it onto the Dell as well.  Internet explorer is so freaking slow on that piece of crap it drives me insane.  It could also be that its two years old and it's used up like an old prostitute.  When you download the Safari beta it says there is an "auto find" which I can't seem to find.  In firefox you can set the preferences to find something on a page by just type and it'll find it.  That feature is awesome because you don't have to hit command F to get the "Find" box up.But so far I love the speed, but other than that I really can't find much difference.</p>
<p>Anyways this is all great news today with Apple.  Considering I dropped $50,000 into Apple yesterday (see previous post) I ended up making almost a thousand for the day and today I visited Mac Rumors and there was some more really good news.  They are reporting that Apple's PC marketshare is up 14% for February....YEAH.   Notebooks up 64% and Laptops up 55% year over year.  Apple continues to grow baby.  I'm kind of curious to see how the stock reacts today.</p>
<p><img src="http://macpokeruk.wordpress.com/files/2008/03/safari-31-mac.jpg" alt="safari-31-mac.jpg" /></p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safari 3 Crashes On Launch]]></title>
<link>http://blueclock.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/safari-3-crashes-on-launch/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>blueclock</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blueclock.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/safari-3-crashes-on-launch/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[**** UPDATE Update: 19 March 08 Safari 3.1 for Windows is out of Beta and available from www.apple.c]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>**** UPDATE Update: 19 March 08 Safari 3.1 for Windows is out of Beta and available from <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari" title="Download Safari">www.apple.com/safari</a> ****</p>
<p>If you're using Safari 3 Beta on Windows XP it may develop a nasty habit of crashing as soon as it launches. This is certainly something that a lot of people experienced as soon as the Beta was released in June, but it seems to have resurfaced in later versions in December.</p>
<p>I experienced this with version 3.0.4. (3.523.12.9) just before going away for the holidays. I hadn't installed a new version of the browser, it just stopped working one day. So now I'm back from holidays I've had a chance to sort the problem out and noticed that other people seemed to be having the same problems around mid December.</p>
<p>The short answer is that you need to install Safari 3.0.5, but that's not available at the usual address of apple.com/safari which is still carrying version 3.0.4.</p>
<p>You can download it from the <a href="http://developer.apple.com" title="Apple Developer website">Apple developer website</a> (registration required, but free).</p>
<p>You  login, choose downloads and then in the menu on the right, choose Safari.There's been a lot of interest in this post so it seems that quite a few people are experiencing this problem. Let me know how you get on in the comments sections and if this new download has cleared up your problems.  Also see the comments below about uninstalling and removing old content first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
